Erhan Önal's Blog

Saturday, August 30, 2008

So long...

With all the "presumptuous" nominees around, I just want to take a moment to salute one of the most incredible presidents, George W. Bush, in his final days at the office.

His was not an easy presidency. Almost immediately after his inauguration, 9/11 shook this country. We were quite patriotic, even chauvinistic perhaps for a while, invading Iraq afterwards, listening to Toby Keith, and boycotting French wine: American art, American master, American beer.*1

Then the spending started - Government spending that would make a socialist blush. When he was up for a re-election in 2004, I told my Democratic friends that everyone deserved a second chance. They would never know whether I was joking or not. Is it true that if you are a Republican before 21, you don't have a heart, and if you are a Democrat after 21, you don't have a brain?*2

I think I speak for many when I say to Bush:

So long, and thanks for all the fish(y government contracts).*3


*1 F. Nietzsche

*2 S. Pinker

*3 D. Adams

Monday, August 25, 2008

A Pseudo-science: Psychiatry

Psychiatry is my favorite pseudo-science (A distant second is alchemy). This is because it almost convinced me it was real. But why is it not?


What is considered "mentally ill" changes according to who is in power and what they want to do. An example: When black slaves in the South ran away to freedom, it wasn’t because they wanted to be free; they suffered from a disease called drapetomania—from drapetes (runaway slave) and mania - I am not making this up. Heck, a black man is even running for president nowadays! (Do we call this new condition, um, Obamamania?)

There was a time when homosexuality was considered a disorder. After homosexuals' protests, American Psychology Association convened and decided that homosexuality "was not a disorder in and of itself." Imagine the same thing being done by the Breast Cancer Association: "We have concluded that breast cancer is not a disease. Stop trying to treat this non-existent condition, and let them die in peace if they must."


According to Intelligent Design proponents, if Darwin's evolution theory can explain as complex a structure as the eye in a convincing way, it can explain everything. Similarly, if I can prove that schizophrenia is a social construct, it will be enough to make my point.


Imagine a paranoid schizophrenic who is a prophet. If this person can get some recruits (especially influential ones like Tom Cruise), nobody would dare put this person into a hospital. On the other hand, if this person is not successful in getting converts, etc., that person can be put away to a hospital. One person's prophet is another one's schizophrenic. Who is right? The answer is: The more powerful is. Shamans were widely used in tribal cultures throughout the ages - they did not behave very "normally", but somebody decided that they were useful. So they became respectable members of their society. Would you put away a person that could talk to Gods and produce rain?

Be it a white man trying to contain his black slaves in 1800s, a parent who is trying to get her child to get better scores by popping ADD pills, or a hallucinating person who is lucky enough to draw millions of followers - mental illnesses are social constructs by which the authority dictates what sort of behavior is acceptable. That range is narrowing nowadays. I leave the Orwellian parallels to the reader to ponder.

I would like to thank Foucault and other Post-Marxist deconstructionists who pointed these facts out in much better ways than I ever will.

Friday, August 08, 2008

"The Undateable"

I am envisioning a new M. Night Shyamalan movie. Its title will be:

THE UNDATEABLE.

Our hero is a loner, with few friends and family around. His name is Dan.

Dan is seeing a psychiatrist for his problems. One Wednesday, as usual, he gets into the doctor's office and waits for his turn. The doctor tells him that he is "working on a new cure." Dan becomes intrigued, for sure. More to come next week, he is told.

Dan's visit to the doctor's office on next Wednesday is brief. At the end of their session, the doctor gives Dan a flyer for a talk the doctor is planning to give that night. ("It is part of the cure!" the doctor says.) While walking to the elevators, Dan notices a beautiful woman talking to the doctor. She has a red dress and walks on high heels. Dan tries to block his thoughts about how he never ends up with someone like her. Thought stopping is a Cognitive Behavioral technique that supposedly lifts the patient's mood. Dan does not believe in its power. But he follows it anyhow.

Dan shows up at the talk. It is only him and the beautiful woman, and there is nobody else in the room. They wait for the doctor for about 20 minutes. The doctor calls Dan and says, "there has been a family emergency, I cannot make it to the talk tonight."

"Well, that was a waste of time!" says Dan to the beautiful woman. She agrees. They keep on talking a bit more, about their common doctor and life and everything. They agree to see each other again.

One thing leads to another, and they start dating. Everything is amazing at first, passionate nights, long walks in the park, etc. They share the same values, they have similar interests. Dan revamps his life, he buys new cologne, new clothes, and goes to the pharmacy to stock up some condoms. He talks to his doctor about his new interest, he omits the fact that she is also his client, of course - no need to rock the boat, he thinks. But: "I told my doctor where I met her", he says to a friend of his. "I am sure the doctor knows it!" He even thinks that his doctor's cure may just be old-fashioned matchmaking... But then he figures the doctor would not do such a thing on the grounds that it would not be ethical for him to match up two of his patients.

A few days later, Dan and his girlfriend meet at a coffee shop. They talk about their mutual doctor, and whether he matched them up intentionally. The girl does not think so, either.

After a couple of days, his girlfriend deserts him. No phone calls, no messages, nothing - no word anywhere. After she does not show up for their date, Dan calls his girlfriend's number - he hears, "This phone number has been disconnected." He goes home and emails her, thinking that maybe she got spooked because of the serious direction the relationship was heading, she will surely respond in a few days he reckons. Nothing happens. He decides to go where she lives, he had only briefly seen it from a distance a while back. The house is all boarded up.

In the meanwhile, Dan's friends and family contact him, wanting to meet his girl. "At least send us some pictures!", they exclaim, after hearing his excuses. He decides to send a few with her in it. Looking for the pictures he took, he notices that some of them were deleted from his computer. How could that be? She is in none of the remaining pictures. His desire to know the truth now becomes unbearable.

He goes to the coffee shop they used to go. He asks the clerk, "Do you remember the last time I was in here? Do you remember the girl near me? Did you happen to see her by any chance?"

The clerk remembers his visit to the shop but does not remember seeing a woman near Dan.

He rushes into his apartment. He frantically searches for the box of condoms in his room; he sees that the box had never been opened. Was he imagining his relationship? Was he, undateable?

Did he have an alter ego that kept his other self guessing? Did she never exist?

"I am going crazy, I need to see you!" Dan says on the phone, to his doctor. "See me first thing in the morning," the doctor says. Dan cannot sleep at night.

In the morning, he asks his doctor the dreaded question: "Do you see a female client just after me on Wednesdays?"

"The last client I see on Wednesdays is YOU!"

He talks to his psychiatrist (Played by Samuel L. Jackson) a bit more about what happened (or what didn't happen). He listens to him carefully and asks: "Do you remember when I told you I was going to try a new cure on you? I hypnotized you that day and tried to make you feel like you were already in a relationship. The thought process was that you would start acting, well, for the lack of a better word, cool, and I thought that would draw other people towards you. But it seems you made up a relationship in your head, and this apparently happened despite the fact that you do not have any previous psychotic episodes in your medical history. For my talk, only you showed up - I called all my clients that night, and you were my only client in there. When you told me you met this person at the venue of the talk, I thought she was just a stranger who dropped in because of her curiosity."

Everything makes sense all of a sudden for Dan. Then again, nothing does.

After concluding that this was an imaginary relationship, Dan undergoes a serious psychiatric treatment with heavy doses of anti-psychotics and anti-depressants.

The next screen comes with a sub-title, "3 years later." We see our hero talking to another gorgeous woman. This time, he is recording his conversations with her, in case he needs to prove himself that this was real. While they are talking, the camera zooms at the recorder, shows the insides of it, the uneasy string tremolo increases in volume, and finally, we see a spark inside the recorder - it goes bust.

Next screen reads: "Written and Directed by M. Night Shyamalan."

Here, I would like to point out that the audience at first will probably think that the doctor fixed his clients up intentionally (Since the doctor was shown talking to her; and Dan and she were in the same room waiting for the doctor to speak) as opposed to her being completely imaginary.

As usual, Mr. Shyamalan in this movie sheds light into the existential problems of human condition with respect to relationships, in the form of a fairy tale. If one imagines a relationship, is it still real? Is it real if one cannot prove it? Where do we draw the line between the provable and the absurd? This movie does not have the answers to these questions, but I suspect it is pointing at the right direction.

P. S. By the way, for those of you who are wondering, M. Night Shyamalan is the clerk that sells Dan condoms.

Sunday, August 03, 2008

Why I write such good blog posts*

It is because I have great ideas. Here is another one:

We have two main presidential candidates. McCain thinks Iraq and Pakistan have a common border (Everyone knows Iran and Pakistan have one), and Obama thinks the U.S. has 57 states (Everyone knows there are 51).

After Bush, are we going to have another not-so-informed president? Ecrasez l'infame! *2

These people are not fit to be Commander-in-Chief. Too old, too young, too right-wing, too left-wing; I want a ticket that is JUST RIGHT. We need a ticket who understands the foreign relations, the Arab world, and internal affairs alike. We need a ticket that really loves this country, the United States of America. And what is that ticket? The answer comes in the form of BARAK/PERES 2008!!!!

Now you guys will say, "Wait! They are not even US citizens - they are Israelis!" No need to panic. First of all, they are already sort of our own de facto state (Almost 51st). And, they do have the right attitude when it comes to lasting peace in the Middle East. I am talking about Israeli-Palestine conflict. Our candidates are too pro-Israeli when it comes to this conflict. For example, having decided to talk about a common U.S. internal affair (The most popular after economy and high gas prices), Obama said Jerusalem should not be divided. Barak made compromises in this area. Take a look at the following table:







Proposed portion of Palestine

for Israel





Supporters





95% - 100%





Mainstream U.S.
politicians (Obama, McCain, etc.)





90% - 95%





Hawkish Israeli
politicians (Netanyahu, Sharon, etc.)





85% - 90%





Dovish Israeli
politicians (BARAK / PERES 08'!!!!!!!)







50% - 85%





Some delusional Europeans





0% - 50%





Nobody in particular





0%





Hamas, Bin Laden, Ahmadinejad




(Source: U.S. News and World Report, Aug. 2007)

The objectivity this world and the U.S. direly need will come from the following ticket:


Let's adorn everywhere with the logo above!

Have I been understood? Barak versus Barack!*


* Ecce Homo, F. N.


*2 Voltaire